Answer:
It wasn’t that long ago when outhouses where the norm. For thousands of years, some variant of the outhouse was the status quo. No one in their right mind dared to build their living space with indoor plumbing, even though the toilet was invented hundreds of years earlier in 1596. To use the latrine indoors would be crazy. Imagine the stink.
No, if you had to “go,” then you were required to exit the building, go down the path, watch out for snakes, spiders or alligators, and use the plank wooden shack in the backyard. This was the way it was for hundreds of years.
Finally, smart people like Thomas Jefferson — yes, one of our founding fathers — got tired of going outside and broke the mold by choosing to not settle for average. They didn’t care what other people thought about their disruptive indoor plumbing idea. They just figured out a way to make it work. Because of that, eventually indoor plumbing became the norm, despite the initial resistance and skepticism.
The question I have for you is what old pattern do you see that needs a disruption — a change over? Anything equivalent to outhouses that need to be challenged? Keep in mind that disruption is centered on a simple mindset of breaking average! If don’t break average you won’t breakthrough.
Explanation:
Hope it will help youu
The first thing a writer should begin with in his research is to <span>examine broad areas of interest. </span>Having had <span>a general sense of an </span>area<span> in which he/she is interested, the writer can then go on </span>to choose a topic for research in that area f interest, with a good understanding of why the research is to be done.
As long as you clearly state the sources and resources of information it should be fine.
Answer:
No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility.
Explanation:
In this context, credibility is only attained by an oath sworn with lawfully certified objects or items representing the religious beliefs of the state and not necessarily the genuine or validity of the witness declaration with such religious object to swore against the declaration of truth in the court of law.
From person to person ( by physical contact )
