Answer:
The formula is mcs^y/o Are you in stanford?
Explanation:
Answer:
"The incarnation of Jesus"
Explanation:
in other words, the argument was that Jesus, one of the members of the trinity, was "made of flesh and bone" and therefore could be painted, unlike the other parts of the trinity which are argued to be "of the spirit"
in other words, if I may be so brash in my wording, people were more or less like
"you can't draw what you can't see!"
and the catholic church was like
"BUT YOU CAN SEE JESUS, HE HAS A BODY"
(sorry but I just found the simplified argument a bit funny, I'm sitting here imagining my siblings arguing about if ghosts are real again...)
(c) and (b) because they don't show the fake one and they don't fool eyes
Answer:
By clarifying, intensifying, and interpreting the event for a specific audience.
Explanation:
First of all, applied media didn't consider every aspect of life as an art form. So, the only way we have to separate these worlds (life and art) it's developing specific creations and events for a particular audience. Only through this way, we'll be able to know exactly the difference between life experience and art, because it was created by ourselves and target a specific audience.
Answer:
THANK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
I appreciate it
