1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enyata [817]
3 years ago
15

What were Alexander Hamilton’s arguments in support of the use of force in suppressing the Whiskey Rebellion?

History
1 answer:
Jet001 [13]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Hamilton was particularly strident in his support of the use of military force against the insurgents, whom he termed "traitors." He requested that Washington allow him to accompany the military, because, he told the General, it would be good public relations for the originator of the objectionable policy to put himself in harm's way for the sake of upholding the policy. Of course, Hamilton's presence in uniform at Washington's side as they rode out to engage the "traitors," had little but the opposite effect.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In 300 words or less, what was the key differences between Aristotle’s definitions of tragedy and comedy.
shutvik [7]
The two major forms of Greek drama were the tragedy<span> and the </span>comedy<span>. According to </span>Aristotle<span>, these elements </span>define<span> a </span>tragedy<span>: The major characters </span>in<span> a </span>tragedy<span> are not average. ... The purpose of a </span>tragedy<span> is catharsis, which cleans the soul of “fear and pity” that most people carry within themselves.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Describe the relationship between humans and the natural environment
RUDIKE [14]
Humans change their environment both positively and negatively and the environment affects how humans live in many different ways. The main interactions between humans and our environment can be grouped into the use of resources and the production of wastes.
8 0
3 years ago
Northern immigrants and Southern farmers generally voted for which political
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

i would say D my bad if im wrong have a good day tho fr :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?
Vlada [557]
This is a matter of opinion.  Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it?  Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives?  Well, firstly, it ended World War II.  That's kind of a big deal.  In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender.  Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked!  Secondly, it was a triumph of science.  The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science.  Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science.  The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb.  </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power.  Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!  

But there's a lot of negatives here, too.  Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone.  Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost.  The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars!  A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan.  When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating.  People were vaporized.  Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage.  People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation.  It was awful!  Thirdly, it caused the arms race.  Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own.  Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think?  Was it worth it?
6 0
4 years ago
A major reason the united states began to seek colonies during the late 1890's was that the
KATRIN_1 [288]

The main reason was because of over population in a small confined area. They also moved father out west so they could get more materials or supplies.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the u.s. do to affect the outcome of the korean war?
    14·1 answer
  • Which helps enable an oligopoly to form within a market?
    6·2 answers
  • "in 2012, how many murders were recorded by police?"
    7·1 answer
  • What does a production possibilities curve represent?
    14·2 answers
  • The ways in which the Greeks and Romans have influenced today’s world.
    10·1 answer
  • The Parthenon was a temple to
    12·1 answer
  • Which American troops received the French croissant de Guerrero for bravery?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Mussolini regime affect the world after ww1<br><br><br> need asap
    11·1 answer
  • Temporary cone-shaped structures made out of animal skin and wooden poles are called _______.
    6·2 answers
  • How are the 1968 democratic convention and the letter from national mobilization committee similar and different?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!