1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
7

The Liberty Bell is a national symbol that is located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The bell was made in London in 1752 and pla

ced in the Pennsylvania State House (now called Independence Hall).The bell first became associated with liberty after writer George Lippard wrote a story in which a bell was rung after the Declaration of Independence was signed. President Franklin Pierce called the bell a symbol of American liberty and the American Revolution.
Though it symbolized liberty, the bell also served as a reminder that many people were actually enslaved. The Liberty Bell got its name from early abolitionists who adopted it as their symbol. The abolitionists pointed out that though part of the bell’s inscription says “Proclaim Liberty,” not all the people throughout the land were liberated.
When the bell was rung for the first time after it arrived in Philadelphia, it cracked. The bell’s crack has been repaired twice. One story says that it cracked when it rang after the death of Chief Supreme Court Justice John Marshall in 1835. Another said the bell was cracked during one of its traveling exhibitions. Whatever its origin, the crack is said to add to the bell’s character, so it has not been repaired again.
14
Select the correct answer.
What is the purpose of the third paragraph of this article?
A.
It talks about how the bell was associated with liberty.
B.
It implies that Justice John Marshall cracked the bell.
C.
It suggests that the bell needs to be repaired again.
D.
It discusses how the Liberty Bell came to be cracked.
English
1 answer:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

its A

Explanation:

hopes this helps

You might be interested in
What was Gerald Graff’s main argument in the article?
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Historian of the profession and of the profession’s arguments, influential commentator and spirited critic of the educational practices that havedefined literature and composition classrooms, forceful advocate for the profession in the public sphere—Gerald Graff stands as the profession’s indomitable and indispensable Arguer-in-Chief. In his books Literature against Itself, Professing Literature, Beyond the Culture Wars, and Clueless in Academe, Graff invites all parties—students, teachers, scholars, citizens—to gather where the intellectual action is, to join the fray of arguments that connect books to life and give studies in the humanities educational force.

    Chicago born and educated in Chicago’s public schools and at the University of Chicago and Stanford University, he became John C. Shaffer Professor of English and Humanities and chair of the English department at Northwestern University, then George M. Pullman Distinguished Service Professor of English and Education at the University of Chicago, then associate dean and professor of English and education at the University of Illinois, Chicago. A founder of Teachers for a Democratic Culture, a president of the Modern Language Association, a presence in Chicago-area high schools, a speaker at over two hundred colleges and universities, Graff has taken our profession to task for the gap between academic culture and the students and citizens of our nation. Critic from the City of the Big Shoulders, he has argued compellingly that the strength of our profession resides in the plurality of its voices and the potential of its classrooms to reveal sprawling, brawling democratic vistas.

Francis March Award for Distinguished Service to the Profession of English, Modern Language Association of America, January 2011

   

Graff’s major influence on education, particularly on the classroom practice of teachers, is reflected today in the Common Core State Standards for K-12 schools:

the Standards put particular emphasis on students’ ability to write sound arguments on substantive topics and issues, as this ability is critical to college and career       readiness. English and education professor Gerald Graff writes that “argument literacy” is fundamental to being educated. The university is largely an “argument culture,” Graff contends; therefore, K–12 schools should “teach the conflicts” so that students are adept at understanding and engaging in argument (both oral and written) when they enter college. . . .            —Appendix, “The Special Place of Argument in the Standards”

Graff’s argument that schools and colleges should respond to curricular and cultural conflicts by “teaching the conflicts” themselves is developed in such books as Professing Literature (1987; reprinted in a 20th Anniversary edition in 2007), which is widely regarded as a definitive history, and Beyond the Culture Wars (1992).   His idea also inspired a series of “Critical Controversies” textbooks which Graff co-edited with James Phelan.

In Clueless in Academe (2003) Graff analyzed (in the book’s subtitle) “how schooling obscures the life of the mind,” and argued that schools and colleges need to demystify academic intellectual culture for all students, not just the high achieving few.  This book led Graff and his wife Cathy Birkenstein to publish a writing textbook, They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (2006), which continues to set records for adoptions by colleges and high schools.  Graff (and now Graff and Birkenstein) has given hundreds of invited lectures and workshops, and his work has been the topic of three special sessions at MLA conferences and part of a special issue of the journal Pedagogy.  Graff served as the President of MLA in 2008.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What is an affix? need help
Nat2105 [25]
<span>stick, attach, or fasten (something) to something else.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Peter is inarticulate when Mr. Dussel teases him about his cat. Why is he inarticulate?
prohojiy [21]
Inarticulate means not being able to speak or express clearly.  In this case, Peter was inarticulate because he was angry when Mr. Dussel teases Peter about his cat which he loves very much. Not the same with Mr. Dussel who claims he is allergic to cats.
8 0
3 years ago
Help <br> i have to study for 3 exams and i have to do this homework
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

a.advert

b.interest

c.collect

d.free

e.security

f.record

g.software

h.secret

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

3 0
2 years ago
how would the story be different if either the aunt or the bachelor, rather than the omniscient narrator, were telling it from t
sertanlavr [38]

Explanation: When you are reading from an third person omniscient POV you get to know everything, whilst in first person limited you will only know that characters POV

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • John Proctor has a change of heart about confessing because _____.
    9·1 answer
  • What structural element can an author use to make the passage of time in a story seem slower? a. long and complex sentences b. r
    8·1 answer
  • The wine sparkled in his eyes and the bells jingled. My own fancy grew warm with the Medoc. We had passed through long walls of
    6·2 answers
  • What literary device is the phrase “ limber as a rag”
    13·2 answers
  • “The Legend of Carman” chose words carefully to achieve certain effects. What effect does the following quote have on the audien
    6·2 answers
  • The group of people sitting in front of you as you begin to speak, who have opinions and ideas all their own, are known as what
    10·1 answer
  • What philosophy about relationships do the king and queen share with the wife of bath in the canterbury tales?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not one of the projects Gulliver saw the professors attempting?
    8·1 answer
  • Tell this story: “Well, I thought it was going to be a regular summer doing all our regular things…”
    12·1 answer
  • They asked, "Have you got a ticket for the concert?"<br> change to indirect speech
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!