Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The colonists were NOT justified in their actions at the Boston Massacre. The colonists lost five lives for no reason. The Boston Massacre wasn’t even a massacre and the colonists didn’t do anything to get killed to begin with. I mean, the colonists did make fun of the Redcoats because they didn’t want the Redcoats around, but they didn’t deserve to die for that reason.
In A History of the US, it says “The mob is said to have taunted the Redcoats, yelling “Fire! Fire!” Captain Preston was said to have told them to hold their fire.” The colonists got killed because they were being troublemakers. They got worse than they deserved.
To conclude, the colonists weren’t justified in their actions at the Boston Massacre, they were treated badly.
You may need to add more but that's what I know.
Sorry if it wasn't helpful.
Answer:
What are the answer choses?
Explanation:
Answer:
a
Explanation:
a young boy selling sun glasses has a strange encounter
Prior restraint, a kind of censorship, allows the government to review the content of printed materials and restrict their distribution.
- Most scholars believe that the First Amendment's guarantee of press freedom includes a prohibition on earlier restraints. The government may put restrictions on speech that make it harder for it to occur or outright prohibit public circulation of media. Prior constraint might be anything as innocent-seeming as a local rule limiting where newspapers can be sold.
- Prior constraint, also known as prior censorship or pre-publication censorship, is restriction of expression that forbids specific forms of expression and is typically applied by a government or organisation.
Thus this is the meaning of prior restraint.
Refer here to learn more about prior restraint: brainly.com/question/1143665
#SPJ4
You start out with who you are you say your name and age. then you put why your emailing the person and explain what you situation or story then you end it by thanking then and hoping they will respond
