Answer:
c.
Explanation:
- <u>She has studied a lot </u>and still she has failed her last two tests so spending more time preparing for the economics tests is not really a good option.
- <u>Retake the course with a different instructor</u> would imply that the professor she has now is a factor that is influencing in her grades which doesn't seem to be the case.
- <u>Change to a different major</u> shouldn't be an option because this is a very dramatic option and the fact that she has failed her tests doesn't mean she's bad at business.
- <u>Therefore, the most suitable option would be that she finds students who are passing and study with them</u>, when a group works together, they usually have a better learning and also she can learn new techniques to study as well as getting feedback from the rest of the students.
Thus, the correct answer is C.
Answer: his actions strengthened his supporters to carry on with what happened as regards the election. Election is a game and should be played like a sportsman, when it's not in your favour, it's better to handle such scenario understandably.
Explanation:
As regards the insurgency that happened, even tough we won't want to already point fingers to President Donald Trump but his actions strengthened his supporters to carry on with what happened as regards the election. Election is a game and should be played like a sportsman, when it's not in your favour, it's better to handle such scenario understandably. The way I viewed Trump is still the way I'd always viewed him he had good intentions but towards the end of his first tenure he allowed the actions of his opposition party get to him and which lead to him reacting and plotting his failure. As regards the Republicans who objected to counting, they won't have any issue with Joe bidden, it was their choice.
This theory is called spontaneous generation: before the 1700 people believed that life could be generated spontaneously from mud or decaying meat, because they observed that, after some time, flies appeared from decay meat, leading them to the conclusion that life could be spontaneously generated.
<span>This theory was refused from both Louis Pasteur and Francesco Redi: they both demonstrated, with similar experiments, that the spontaneous generation theory was false.
The experiment is quite simple, and it’s based on two pieces of meat: one is left exposed to the air, one is covered to prevent exposure. After some time, from the piece of meat exposed some flies started to appear, while the covered piece of meat was free of flies.
This result proved that the theory of spontaneous generation was false. </span>
<span>The experiment is based on a principle called “manipulated variable”: a single variable is the object of a controlled experiment, in which two test is conducted at the same time, in order to prove that the difference of results in the two tests is caused by the only different variable (in this case, the variable is the exposure to the air and the hypothesis is that the flies appeared in the decaying meat not because of spontaneous generation but because larvas where carrying out by air).
</span>
<span>Bronfenbrenner developed a complex bioecological perspective on human development that includes five interlocking contextual systems. This approach analyses how the environment around the child which is called as micro system help him in his development. He is a Russian psychologist who based his work in America.</span>
The answer to this question is complex, but the major factor in the change would be the dissapearance of the ocean currences that exist due to temperature differences. In this way, Earth would lose a lot of its biodiversity.