Answer: This argument has Some merits but it also has some logical errors that undermines its reasoning and conclusion.
Explanation:
(1) IT FAILED TO GIVE THE TOTAL POPULATION OF WORKERS FROM WHERE THE SAMPLE(1200 PEOPLE) WERE DERIVED AND WHAT SAMPLING METHOD WAS USED: This is a logical error, sampling has to be in RELATION TO THE POPULATION.The sampling method should have been defined.Samples may have been taken from a given A CLASS OF WORKERS.
(2) IT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN CLEARER AND OTHER CHOICES RELATED TO MANAGEMENT ISSUES: It should have made more choices of questions about management issues so that a BROAD, ELABORATE, REASONABLE,ACCURATE AND CONVINCING conclusion will be arrived at.
The climax is when Rikki decides to fight the cobras in their home territory. However this plan is interrupted when the cobras sneak up within striking distance of the son.
Science is the study of the natural world based through experiments and observation. Pseudoscience on the other hand is a system of theories, assumptions, and methods that are regarded as scientific. They both present information but Science is based on facts while Pseudoscience does not adhere to any scientific method.
We can deduce here that the element “Kai’s frustration peaked as the storm rolled in" represents is an: Allegory.
<h3>What is an allegory?</h3>
An allegory refers to a literary device which is used for representation in which a character or something is seen to represent a hidden meaning.
Thus, we see here that the element is allegory.
Learn more about an allegory on brainly.com/question/26135515
#SPJ1
Answer: I would probably visit the Eiffel Tower because of how pleasant it looks to the eye.
Explanation:
