Answer:
the same ammount of the persons beleiev in democrats can vote
Explanation:
Answer:
The right of people to keep and bear arms
Explanation:
The second ammendment
This assertion is accurate. Police composite sketches are made more so that suspects or victims will be recognized by friends, family, and acquaintances than in the anticipation that a passerby will recognize someone from a sketch as they pass by.
<h3>The purpose of police composite sketches</h3>
Police primarily use facial composites in their (often serious) criminal investigations. In an effort to identify the suspect, the suspect's face is recreated using these photographs. In archeological investigations, facial reconstruction can be utilized to visualize ancient mummies or human remains.
<h3>Accuracy of composite sketches</h3>
Hard numbers are hard to find, however some study indicates that less than 20% of the time, composite photos or facial sketches of suspects are helpful. According to other studies, the number may potentially be as low as 8%.
<h3>How are police sketches created?</h3>
In order to construct a composite sketch, a forensic artist typically speaks with witnesses and victims at the crime scene. This artist may also work as a patrol officer or a private contractor. The composite could be entirely drawn by hand or digitally.
Learn more about forensic artist: brainly.com/question/22025785
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.
Explanation:
According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.
But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using <em>"force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant"</em>. Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is option B.
</u>
