1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elodia [21]
3 years ago
13

When we elect representatives to Congress we are applying this principle of government

History
1 answer:
Damm [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Popular Sovereignty

Explanation:

When the representatives are elected to congress, the principle of government that applies is the Popular sovereignty. The principle of popular sovereignty states that the authority and power to create as well as sustain the government lies among the people of the country. It is based on the concept that people are real rulers in a democracy and the elected representatives are servants of people who are the sovereigns.

You might be interested in
What was the edict of milan about?
viktelen [127]
It was an agreement to treat christians nicely/fairly in the Roman Empire, rather than treating them poorly. It was later that christianity became the most popular religion there. Hope I helped :)
4 0
3 years ago
In 1765, Britain's Parliament passed a tax on colonial newspapers and pamphlets called the
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
Stamp act because stamps go on mail
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the bill of rights protect individuals civil liberties
Vikki [24]

The first alternative is correct (A).

The Bill of Rights represented by the first ten amendments to the US Constitution represents the guarantee of fundamental rights for American citizens. Since the institution of the bill of rights, citizens have had constitutional protection for the right to freedom of expression, religion, private property, legal process in lawsuits, among others.  These are achievements of the democratic regime that have been preserved over the years.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do scientist think contributed to the development of language?
scoundrel [369]

Answer: Read vvv

Explanation:

As it’s impossible to track words and linguistic ability directly through the archaeological record, scientists have previously attempted to study the evolution of language through “proxy indicator” skills, such as early art or the ability to make more sophisticated tools. The authors of the new study, a team of scientists led by Thomas Morgan, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, took a different approach. Rather than consider toolmaking solely a proxy for language ability, the team explored how language might help modern humans learn to make tools using the same techniques their early ancestors did.

In the experiment, the scientists took 184 volunteers—students from the University of St. Andrews in the United Kingdom—and broke them into five groups; archaeologists then instructed the first person in the technique known as Oldowan stone-knapping. Oldowan tools, named for the famous Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, where archaeologists Louis and Mary Leakey discovered the implements in the 1930s, were widespread among early humans between 2.5 and 1.8 million years ago. The technique consisted of striking a stone “hammer” against a stone “core” to flake off pieces and create a sharp edge that could be used to cut, chop and scrape; the flakes themselves were also sharp enough to use for cutting plants and butchering animals.

Each of the five groups proceeded in different ways: In the first, a pair of volunteers were simply given the stone “core,” a hammer and some examples of flakes, then told to go about their business without guidance. In the second group, the second student learned how to make the tools by simply watching his fellow volunteer (who had been taught the technique) and trying to duplicate his actions without communication. In the third, the volunteers showed each other what they were doing but with no talking or gesturing. The fourth group was allowed to gesture and point, while in the fifth group, the “teacher” was allowed to say whatever he or she wanted to the other volunteers. In the next round of the experiment, the learner became the teacher, creating five different “chains” of transmission; in all, the volunteers produced more than 6,000 stone flakes.

According to the results of the study, published this week in the journal Nature Communications, the first group predictably had very little success when left to their own devices. What was striking, however, was that performance improved very little among those who simply watched their fellow volunteers make the tools. Only those who were allowed to gesture and talk while teaching performed significantly better than the baseline the scientists had established. By one measurement, gesturing doubled the likelihood that a student would produce a viable stone flake in a single strike, while verbal teaching quadrupled that likelihood.

Taking their results into consideration, researchers concluded that early humans might have developed the beginnings of spoken language–known as a proto-language–in order to successfully teach and pass along the ability to make the stone tools they needed for their survival. Such capacity to communicate would have been necessary, they suggest, for our ancestors to make the rapid leap from the Oldowan toolmaking process to more advanced stone tools, which occurred around 2 million years ago.

Dietrich Stout, an archaeologist at Emory University in Atlanta, praised the new study’s innovation, telling Science magazine that “a major strength of the paper is that it adopts an experimental approach to questions that have otherwise largely been addressed through intuition or common sense.” Still, Stout and other scientists urge caution before taking the study’s conclusions at face value without more direct proof. For one thing, the study’s conclusions don’t take into account that the modern volunteers have grown up with language, so it could be expected that they would learn more effectively with it than without; this may not have been true for early humans.

hoped it helped :D

8 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP 100 POINTS!<br> In the pic
Katarina [22]

Answer: top to bottom, left column - 2, 6, 5, 10, ran out of time sry, hope that helped a little

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the ancient India caste system the largest group was the (A) untouchables. (B) viziers. (C) bhramins. (D) vaishyas
    8·1 answer
  • Who is the 45th president of the United States of America
    5·2 answers
  • Can anyone give me a brief summary of influences that preceded the founding of the United States?
    10·1 answer
  • Based on his speech, Hoover would have been MOST likely to support
    15·2 answers
  • What do historians sometimes call eastern europe?
    9·1 answer
  • OSHA is a government agency that makes sure employees are protected in the workplace. true or false?
    14·1 answer
  • Guarantees of personal freedoms against possible threats from the government are called _____.
    10·2 answers
  • The term pharmacists was first used by?
    15·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes this graphic?
    14·1 answer
  • What factor most contributed to the rising power of the Byzantine Empire in the 4th century? A. The expansion of the Ottoman Emp
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!