Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
Company net income will DECREASE by $2,000 if the order is accepted.
Explanation:
Company net income will DECREASE by $2,000 if the order is accepted.
Additional order will produce additional sales revenue of $150 per unit
The marginal cost for this order = Variable costs (Direct material + Direct labour + variable cost) =$152 per unit
Since the marginal cost ($152) is more than the revenue ($150)per unit, there will be a loss of $2 per unit.
So the net income of the company will DECREASE by $2000 ($2x 1000)
Answer:
$4,908,000
Explanation:
The computation of accumulated depreciation expense for this purchase is shown below:-
Depreciation expense = ((Cost of machine - Salvage) ÷ Estimated useful life of machine)
= (($40,900,000 - $4,090,000) ÷ 15) × 2
= $36,810,000 ÷ 15 × 2
= $4,908,000
Therefore for computing the depreciation expense we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
Verbal/linguistic learners prefer learning activities that involve reading, writing, and speaking.
Explanation:
