Answer:
The Federalist Papers are a collection of 85 articles in support of the ratification of the Constitution of the United States.
The Federalist Papers were published from October 1787 to August 1788 in the New York newspapers The Independent Journal and The New York Packet. A collection of all articles entitled “Federalist” was published in 1788. They are considered not only the most valuable source of interpretation of the Constitution (in the collection the meaning of the provisions of the Constitution is explained by its authors), but also an outstanding philosophical and political work defending federalism as the best political system for a nation.
In the summer of 1787, the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia developed the text of the Constitution, after which its ratification was required by the state legislatures. The mood among the deputies of the latter was mixed. Opponents of the Constitution openly called for not accepting it. Then, in the fall of 1787, Alexander Hamilton published in the newspaper the first of the articles of the Federalist Papers. Later, with the participation of Madison and Jay, as many as 85 articles were published, although it was originally planned to write 25. The purpose of the articles was to convince the New York State community of the need to adopt the Constitution and thus create a single state from the confederation of independent colonies. The published articles had a wide public outcry, and as a result, on July 27, 1788, the New York Convention ratified the Constitution with an advantage of three votes.
I can give you my take on it:
In command economies the quantity and more importantly the prize of the products is decided by the government and not by the people in production. As a result, people in the production can't have the motivation of producing more, as they won't benefit from it. So command economy encourages low motivation among the workers (i believe this was the case in the Eastern Block)
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Behaviorally anchored rating scales when we must keep in mind that these specify behaviorally anchored rating scales.
Behavior-based rating scales (BARS) are systems for measuring employee performance. Measure them according to defined behavioral patterns. It provides both qualitative and quantitative data to the evaluation process. BARS includes a combination of quantified ratings, incidents, and narratives.
Using behavior-based rating scales to measure employee performance usually makes it easier to know exactly what individual employees need to do to improve their performance. Bars are usually displayed vertically with scale points ranging from 5 to 9.
Learn more about behavior at
brainly.com/question/1741474
#SPj4
