Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which statement paraphrases what Snow says in the memoir about his encounter with Gandhi, would be: B. It is possible to respect a man even though you do not agree with his philosophy or tactics.
Explanation:
This memoir, about the encounter between American journalist Edgar Snow and Mahatma Gandhi, shows in general not only the impact that Gandhi´s death had on an entire nation, but also on the journalist who performed this encounter. One thing that struck Snow most positively was to see the way that Gandhi embraced all men, regardless of their views, their customs, or their particular religion, because to him, what mattered was the truth, truth was Gandhi´s own religious base, so he thought that as long as truth was inside a person, then nothing else mattered; we was worth Gandhi´s respect.
I believe it is D because it is talking about how it causes all these bad things which is why you need to start streaming it like a treat
hope it helped
Answer:
here it is
Explanation:
1. After I finished the Chicago Marathon, my legs were tired.
2. Muhammad Ali, was the greatest athlete ever.
3. My mom told me to clean my room, wash the dishes, and take out
the garbage.
4.. I want to listen to my iPod in class, but my teacher won't let me.
5. If I had the chance, I would change our mascot to a gorilla.
6. No, I don't want to go to Taco Bell for lunch.
7. The fireworks were fun to watch.
8. Marcus Brutus, who was tricked by Cassius, was the last
conspirator to stab Caesar.
9. Antony, thinking the conspirators would kill him, fled after he saw
Caesar's dead body.
Q: When analyzing a speech, what should be your first step?
<em>Hey there! Thanks for posting a question on Brainly! </em>
<em />
<em>When analyzing a speech, you'd probably think "I should definitely determine who's speaking first".</em>
<em />
<em>Well, let me tell you something... that's not the first thing you should do. Name of the speaker can wait, but first you'll have to identify their main argument. What is it that they're talking about? What evidence do they have to back themselves up? </em>
<em />
<em>Once you identify the argument, the next steps would be to identify the speaker (A) and their personal biases (D). </em>
<em />
<em>Hope this helped you out!</em>
<em>-Namira</em>
