Where is the story at? Show a picture
Answer:
A very nice place for young and old! For train enthusiasts or elsewhere, the sets are very fun. he rare trains are present and in a faultless condition. Diving with delight in the midst of steam locomotives. The platforms allow you to see the inside of the wagons, including the one made especially for the emperor Napoleon III. steam locomotive is well explained as well as the first trains of the departures on vacation. We can take advantage of a journey in time through the times and their locomotives. Without forgetting a return on the past and the origins of the locomotive. Museum where everyone will come out delighted.
Translated already to English
Hope that helps
Answer:They noticed kids who were better starting off were the ones to practice/study more. Theynoticed the kids who needed more practice were the ones to keep practicing less. The better students kept practicing and making themselfs better. Paragraph 3 says ´´Everyone from all three groups started playing at roughly the same age, around five years old. In those first few years, everyone practiced roughly the same amount, about two or three hours a week. But when the students were around the age of eight, real differences started to emerge. The students who would end up the best in their class began to practice more than everyone else: six hours a week by age nine, eight hours a week by age twelve, sixteen hours a week by age fourteen, and up and up, until by the age of twenty they were practicing´´
Explanation:
The poet described about the kill of the Element is given below.
Explanation:
In the 1920s a young would-be poet, an ex-Etonian named Eric Blair, arrived as a Burma Police recruit and was posted to several places, culminating in Moulmein. Here he was accused of killing a timber company elephant, the chief of police saying he was a disgrace to Eton. Blair resigned while back in England on leave, and published several books under his assumed name, George Orwell.
In 1936 these were followed by what he called a “sketch” describing how, and more importantly why, he had killed a runaway elephant during his time in Moulmein, today known as Mawlamyine. By this time Orwell was highly regarded, and many were reluctant to accept that he had indeed killed an elephant. Six years later, however, a cashiered Burma Police captain named Herbert Robinson published a memoir in which he reported young Eric Blair (whom he called “the poet”) as saying back in the 1920s that he wanted to kill an elephant.
All the same, doubt has persisted among Orwell’s biographers. Neither Bernard Crick nor DJ Taylor believe he killed an elephant, Crick suggesting that he was merely influenced by a fashionable genre that blurred the line between fiction and autobiography.
To me, Orwell’s description of the great creature’s heartbreakingly slow death suggests an acute awareness of wrongdoing, as do his repeated protests: “I had no intention of shooting the elephant… I did not in the least want to shoot him … I did not want to shoot the elephant.” Though Orwell shifts the blame on to the imperialist system, I think the poet did shoot the elephant. But read the sketch and decide for yourself.
