Answer:
A) El autor piensa que los movimientos de indigenismo y nacionalismo son casi iguales porque hubo una gran influencia de Europa.
B) El autor piensa que la conexión entre los dos continentes resulta en una fusión original de ideas y estilos de literatura.
C) El autor piensa que si no tuviera la conexión entre los dos países, no habría literatura importante ni original en Latinoamérica.
D) El autor piensa que la literatura latinoamericana tiene un estilo completamente diferente del estilo en Europa y comparte pocos elementos.
Explanation:
the explanation is the answer:
A) The author thinks that the indigenous and nationalist movements are almost the same because there was a great influence from Europe.
B) The author thinks that the connection between the two continents results in a fusion original ideas and styles of literature.
C) The author thinks that if he did not have the connection between the two countries, there would be no important or original literature in Latin America.
D) The author thinks that Latin American literature has a completely different style from the style in Europe and shares few elements.
Translated text: There is a constant exchange between the Americas and Europe. For example, when romanticism came to Latin America, it was transformed into a distinctly Latin version. This movement kept certain elements of romantic literature, but then went even further. This is when the nationalism of the Romantic era turned into a return to indigenous roots, and thus indigenism was born. Aves sin nido by Turner and Hombre de Maíz por Asturias serve as examples and were catalysts for the works that followed. The result of the European influence encouraged a new identity for Latin writers.
i'm spanish, but doing this helps me to learn english too :D (this isn't an answer by a weird bot lol)
