Answer:
The correct answer is C)
Explanation:
To Alice, the entire trial was a sham. There was a Jury (of which the Lizard was a member) that was incapable of reading. If this was so, how could they evaluate any evidence that spoke to her credit or demerit?
For in the same Chapter 7, a letter or a collection of verses was read which according to the Queen was a piece of evidence against Alice. The Jury, even upon the challenge to do so by Alice, could not interpret the same.
Cheers!
In The Diary of Anne Frank, entry for Saturday<span>, July 15, 1944, Anne reflects on how she conquered Peter but shouldn't have allowed herself to, and how they would not be able to be casual friends again because he was now very dependent on her. However, while there was some sort of intimacy between the characters, this was never made official. Therefore, the best answer is option A.</span>
I think the answer is experience. I'm sorry if I'm wrong though.
Answer:
same my answer and questions both are deleted
Answer:
It is nor
neither the squad master nor his assi had the clipboard
