1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andriy [413]
3 years ago
5

In the early sixteenth century a group of Muslim nomads from the north, called the _________________, invaded and conquered ____

________________. Soon after, they began fighting with the _______________________.
dont put a link
History
1 answer:
san4es73 [151]3 years ago
8 0
Nomands

constantinople
You might be interested in
"The Chinese Communists’ disastrous attempt in the late 1950s to depart from the Soviet model by rapidly establishing locally di
shusha [124]

Answer:

The Great Leap Forward

Explanation:

Mao Zedong was the chairman of Communist Party of china (CPC) since its establishment in 1949 until 1976.

It was five year plan 1958-62 to industrialise china in the shortest amount of time and was aimed at producing mass amount of steel and grain.  It was started in 1958 by Mao Zedong but the  plan failed to industrialise the Chinese economy and thousand of Chinese were killed.

Commune was at the centre of the plan, a commune was combination of smaller farm collectives and had 4000-5000 households.

7 0
3 years ago
Was the u.s supportive of Latin American revolutions
Ksju [112]
No, the u.s was not supportive of Latin American Revolutions
8 0
3 years ago
How was life in towns different from life on the manor?
Yanka [14]
Well, people who lived on a manor were very much self-sufficient. They grew most of their own food, and peasant women spun and wove wool and flax into cloth to make the family's clothing, made their own butter and cheese, brewed their own ale,and would make household items like candles and soap. 

In towns, people would be more likely to buy a lot of things ready-made from shops and markets. There would be more specialised tradesmen and craftsmen than there would be in a village. 

In both town and country, families tended to be involved in the family enterrpise, whatever it might be. In the country, all family members would labour on the family farm, in the town the whole family might be involved in the family business or trade, whatever it might be. 

In a manor, the inhabitants would be subjec to a large extent to the will of the Lord of the manor, and would owe him labour services on his won farm (demesne), and if they were serfs they were not free to leave unless the lord gave them permission. In the towns, most people were free and lived their lives independent of the will of a lord (hence the saying 'town air makes you free'). 

In both town and country, the church was an important part of people's lives. A church was not just for church services, often the building was used for secular purposes as well, in the village it would be used for meetings of the manor court, in towns it might be used for meetings of the town council, guild meetings etc. 

In the country, women were normally expected to be the family doctors, and would be expected to make home rmeedies for ailments, be able to stitch up wounds, set broken bones etc. In a town, people would be more likely to have access to a doctor or apothecary, or to a barber-surgeon. 

Another major difference of course would be that far more people in those days lived in the country than in towns, the manorial way of life would be more familiar to a far greater number of people than town life.
4 0
3 years ago
PLZZZZ ANSWER ASAP!!!! 20 POINTS!!!
Xelga [282]
1. Absolute monarchy, or absolutism, meant that the ultimate authority to run a state was in the hands of a king who ruled by divine right. Divine right was the claim that a king was given his position by some higher power. ... Because kings and queens were given their authority by god, their power was unconditional
2. An oligarchy is a power structure that allows a few businesses, families, or individuals to rule. They have enough power to turn the county to benefit them to the exclusion of other members. They maintain their power through their relationships with each other.
8 0
3 years ago
Please help. ill give you brainiest
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

1) Czar you would not be happy about the revolvolution as it was supposed to remove his power. As workers you would be happy, and hope for some better rights and living conditions. The soldiers were probably tired of war, and maybe wanted to come back home.

2) A treaty should try and bring peace and stability. A classic example is the treaty of versailles where it is a cause of WW2, it broke the german economy and country with the restriction. Maybe if the treaty were better for Germany we may not have had WW2.

3) If you were germany you would be angry that all the blame is put on you. You will find it unfair you have to pay a big amount of money to the other countries. The treaty feels like a big hard push for Germany, and is a reason WW2 started, and how Hitler managed to grab the power in Germany.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was not directly caused by industrialization in America
    10·1 answer
  • When jefferson wrote the declaration of independence he used the ideas of philosophers from?
    9·1 answer
  • why did president Roosevelt and prime minister Churchill want to create the Declaration on liberated Europe
    11·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of joint companies
    14·1 answer
  • Aggressive preparation for war is know as
    15·1 answer
  • Three of the following were accomplished by Henry IV of France. Which was NOT?
    9·1 answer
  • URGENTEEEE
    10·1 answer
  • How did cultural nationalism grow in Latin America
    11·2 answers
  • 5. Why did Muslims not want to be part of an independent India?
    14·2 answers
  • HELP QUICK PLZ
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!