Could you give us more information on the question? What book is this from
1)solution 2)HM 3)HM 4)Solution 5)HM 6)solution
The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
Answer:
I would say to use all the parties involved to shape their experience from a different perspective. The way you shape your perspective can have a big impact on how your reader sees your all-inclusive and overall plot. The author should take part as one of the characters and you should show WHAT happened and you need to establish your perspective uniquely. A key thing is that you want your reader to take away from what you are writing, and the tone of voice you are using. Also for the problem, why was it a problem? Who helped solve or help the problem? If there is a solution, then explain that in detail, and since it is a personal narrative, how do you feel overall from the problem or conflict? I HOPE THIS HELPS, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG!
