Because out of that very low chance of winning there a 30 you can win
Answer:
Yes, it is ethical.
I think it is ethical because in this age, every website let the user choose weather or not they would like to be tracked an their website. If they choose not to then their data will not be collected, if they choose yes, then their data will be collected. All the social phycology research was collected from users and/or people who agreed to be users of collected data. With that being said, if you allow your data to be collected, if you allow random people to see how you operate as a human, then you're willing to have that data used to give you adds that you might actually want. All in all, you, the user, has the choice weather or not they allow this to happen, so yes, it is ethical
Explanation:
May I have brainliest please? :)
And sorry for the nunce who also answered this question, he's going around making life harder for people, all around this website :/
If Sagan scored 1200 divide 980 divide by 100 =3 Andrea =27 so I think that Andrea has the most then sagan 3×9=27
The FitnessGram pacer test is a multistage aerobic capacity test that progressively gets more difficult as it continues. The 20 meter pacer test will begin in 30 seconds. Line up at the start. The running speed starts slowly but gets faster each minute after you hear this signal bodeboop. A single lap should be completed every time you hear this sound. Ding Remember to run in a straight line and run as long as possible. The second time you fail to complete a lap after the sound, your test is over. The test will begin on the word start. On your mark. Get ready!!!! START!!!!
