1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madreJ [45]
3 years ago
7

Determine whether each description applies to the royalists, roundheads, or both

History
2 answers:
Butoxors [25]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Roundheads:

  • Puritans and members of lower classes
  • Led by Oliver Cromwell
  • Emerged victorious in the Civil War

Royalists

  • Wore richly decorated clothing
  • Were aristocrats
  • Supporters of Charles I

Both:

  • Fought in the English Civil War

Rom4ik [11]3 years ago
3 0

-Puritans and member of lower classes: The roundheads

-Supporters of Charles I: The royalists (also known as "Cavaliers")

-Fought in the English civil war: Both of them (They were the main two sides on the civil war)

-Wore richly decorated clothing: The royalists (Even though this wasn't the prime objective, they became well known for this)

-Led by Oliver Cromwell: The roundheads.

-Were aristrocats: The royalists

-Emerged victorious in the civil war: The roundheads.


Explanation: The English civil war was a series of three main armed and political conflicts. Before the English civil war and it's outcome, the Parliament of England hadn't had a big influence on the goverment system. In fact, the Parliament didn't have the authority to make any desition and their role was only to advice the King and only after the monarch himself summoned them and even more important, the King had the power to disolve it at his will. This was due to the belief that the monarch is designated by God and, therefore, he's the only one capable of ruling his land.

This historical context provoced that some members of the society, specially puritans and lower class members, started to look for a change. The objective was simple: to give the Parliament the authority to participate and make desitions. They suported the Parliament and the idea of having a role on the goverment desitions, they started to repudiate what they considered to be "royalist" or courtly fashion (to wear decorated clothing, the use of long ringlets, etc.). For this reason they decided not only to wear their common clothes but also to closely crop their hair, therefore,<em> this people, whose leade was Oliver Cromwell, were called "roundheads"</em> by some higher classes in an act of derision.

On the other hand, the royalists supported the King (Charles I) and the idea of absolute power for the monarch, most of them were aristrocats. Both sides adopted the nicknames given by the other side, nicknames that were originated from the mockery ("Roundheads" and "Cavaliers")

The outcome of the civil war was:

- The execution of King Charles I.

- The exile of the King's son.

- The monarch can't gover without the Parliament consent.



You might be interested in
What was the main reason imperial nations built large naval forces? to initiate sea-based attacks on other nations to demonstrat
Sholpan [36]
The main reason why imperial nations built large naval forces was to "<span>to protect their economic interests" since the longer the reach of a nation, the more vulnerable it was. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone please help me
dusya [7]
Yes, you can build a society without social hierarchy. Look back at villages with no mayor, or anyone really as the ‘leader’. Everyone was at everyone’s level, just trying to survive. But when people start to think they are better then everyone else, or they start to horde supplies for just themselves, that is when a social hierarchy starts to occur. So as long as that does not happen, you can create a society without a social hierarchy.

No, you can not build a society without a social hierarchy. A social hierarchy is the bones of society. Monarchy’s, Capitalism, Democracy, etc. they all have a social hierarchy in them. There is always the top dog, and there is always the smaller one. Think of all of the great empires and nations. England, the was a king/queen. Rome, it had emperors, and was also a republic. China, had emperors as well.


(Sorry but you are probably gonna have to fine tune the paragraphs. I made it so you can go either way, yes or no.)
8 0
3 years ago
Why did England believe they had rights to New Netherlands?
olga55 [171]

Answer: They believed that because of similarities to the land and name

Explanation:

Dutch and English Colonization in New England Although the Netherlands only controlled the Hudson River Valley from 1609 until 1664, in that short time, Dutch entrepreneurs established New Netherland, a series of trading posts, towns, and forts up and down the Hudson River that laid the groundwork for towns that still exist today.

3 0
3 years ago
Please help me
V125BC [204]
He changed the ways of others we may know him as he is in fortune cookies to his sayings he always said the right things.
6 0
3 years ago
Explain one similarity in how religion affected trade for Jews and Muslims
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

they hated eachother

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Department of the _______________ is the newest department in the federal government.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the main way that business leaders helped the war effort during World War II?
    12·2 answers
  • Where does equality before law come from?
    14·1 answer
  • Why were the Articles of Confederation replaced?
    5·1 answer
  • PLease hurry!!<br><br> what did the louisiana state lottery company do in 1888?
    11·1 answer
  • The lives of Athenian girls were very different from the lives of girls today. Write a brief essay that explains the differences
    13·1 answer
  • which of the following is not an example of how the transcontinental railway encouraged industrialization
    12·1 answer
  • Read the passage:
    6·2 answers
  • What is the answer<br><br> Please help me
    15·2 answers
  • Which united states president tried to expand the size of the supreme court to 15 justices.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!