the answer is emphasize peace
The plan called for a naval blockade of the Confederate littoral, a thrust down the Mississippi, and the strangulation of the South by Union land and naval forces.
Answer:
The concept inadvertently challenged by Progressives' call for expert opinions was:
Elected officials' autonomy
Explanation:
Through the efforts of the Muckrakers or progressive journalist, the corruption of the established institutions and leaders were exposed. Elected officials because they were wallowing in corruption did not want their administrations probed by non-elected bodies, sought vicariously for autonomy. They wanted the checks and balances through independent judiciary to be removed. However, during the 1890s to 1920s, an era known as the Progressives Era, the progressives challenged the existing autonomy of elected officials, proposing to end the monumental corruption that was in vogue at that time.
David M. Potter and Michael F. Holt had opposing viewpoints on what released the Civil War insurgency.
<h3>What difference of opinion did potter and holt have?</h3>
1)One substantial war of words among David M. Potter's and Michael F. Holt's historic readings of the Civil War is that Potter blamed the Civil War on the North and South's perennial sectional tensions.
He stated that it became ingrained sectionalism, now no longer opposing perspectives on the subject of slavery, that brought about the Civil War.
Holt, on the alternative hand, said that the Civil War became a smash from the American records of compromise and that it became now no longer a standard incident in the American political democratic process.
Thus, Potter's clarification of the Civil War's purpose centered on innate divisive tendencies among the North and the South, however, Holt's blamed the disintegration of the two-celebration system, which allowed democratic opposition.
Learn more about potter and holt here:
brainly.com/question/20201935
#SPJ4
Narmer was the first egyptian pharaoh