My idea on cancel culture is that it can get extreme and unproductive when it gets toxic.
<h3>Cancel culture</h3>
Cancel culture is a way that people use to express their displeasure and anger over issues that they find dissatisfying.
It leads to ostracizing people or organizations due to their acts, behaviors or opinions.
Even though it can deter people and even organizations from posting offensive views, it could be negative most times.
- Cancel culture can get too far when the people are against anyone who has a different opinion from them.
- It could be regarded as toxic if it drives the other party to want to harm themselves
- If it involves invasion of privacy and threat.
It is not the best response for wrongdoing because there are other ways of tackling issues and disagreements without ostracizing the other person.
Read more on cancel culture on:
brainly.com/question/21840416?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
As per the given description, while emphasizing the plot in a literary analysis it becomes essential naturally to retell or restate the summary briefly as it assists in displaying that how the conclusions or analysis have been drawn as per the events occurred in the story and how they both(summary and analysis) are comprehending each other and interrelated. The summary would help affiliate the interpretations associated to particular elements of the plot. It would also assist in examining the elements of the text and present how certain elements are working positively or negatively in the work. Thus, the statement is <u>true.</u>
Answer:
cause at that time almost everything was natural nothing was a mixture of anything but now we don't know weather the thing is natural or not or is it mixed with something else also
for eg in earlier times fruits were grown naturally but now they r being injected to grow faster which is not natural and might cause us problems in future but the ppl in past didn't
Answer:
she sucks Because of the lack of abilities she has
Explanation:
