What are the answer choices?
Spending $100,000 to clone a pet is not worth it. If you valued and loved your pet you should not try and replace them.It would be like cloning a family member.Sure cloning your pet may seem like you never lost it, but it would probably only clone it's physical appearance and not what made it so unique to you.For example the qualities that made you happy like it's personality.
I would take this risk to make my own company because it could make me a millionaire and my company can be famous. However, it can make me poor and homeless. Furthermore, I can have a low social life.
Hope this helps! :)
The client himself/herself should provide release of information consent before patient information can be provided through email.
According to HIPPA Privacy Rule, authorization must be written in specific terms. This rule allows healthcare providers to communicate electronically and also lays down some rules to be followed. The information can be passed on through email after the consent of the patient.
The consent of physician, the relative or the office manager does not matter.
Therefore, the correct answer is (A)Client.
Learn more about HIPPA Privacy Rule on brainly.com/question/11069745
#SPJ10