<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
<span>Aftermath. One year later, however, in Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), theU.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
If the US always used force, then we'd have a lot more enemies.
Explanation:
The US tends to be cooperative especially given our overwhelming military force, but if we just used force, it would strain the economy because we have trade partners that aren't our exactly our allies like China or Russia. Countries definitely would be afraid of us and might band together to confront us and be our enemies.
Great Britain changed some of its colonial policies after 1763 for several reasons. One reason why the British established their colonies was to make money. ... As a result, the British needed to increase their military presence in the colonies to protect the colonists from possible attacks by the Native Americans.
Answer:
Hawaii (The Annexation of Hawaii)
Explanation:
America's annexation of Hawaii in 1898 extended U.S. territory into the Pacific and highlighted resulted from economic integration and the rise of the United States as a Pacific power.
