i would say the answer is the third one
Answer:
The turning point of WWII is detestably Stalingrad.
Explanation:
The Nazis invaded Russia on June 22, 1941. This was all in part of Operation Barbarossa. Nazis took over much of western Russia expending a great number of man power and resources in the process. Germany reached Stalingrad and began their assaults on the city on August 23, 1942. The Soviets stood their ground despite having far less training, equipment, firepower, food, and other resources. The Soviet troops outnumbered the Nazis and were able to successfully defend Stalingrad. The Nazis expended so many resources during Operation Barbarossa that their hold on the Eastern front was nearly crippled. Seeing this, Stalin began ordering an offensive campaign on the Nazis. Nazi occupied territories began siding with the Soviets which allowed the Soviets to grow in strength. With the defeat and dramatic loss of resources due to Stalingrad and the Soviet offensive campaign along with the increased allied manpower and bombing runs across the Western Front, Germany was surrounded.
Answer:
How did Napoleon come to dominate most of Europe by 1812? He defeated European powers by moving large armies rapidly, taking risks, and being willing to suffer great losses. He annexed some lands and forced alliances on others. He put friends and family members on several European thrones.
Explanation:
One of the most important changes Charlemagne made was abandoning the gold standard and putting all of Europe on the same silver currency<span>. Trade became easier and the continent prospered, aided by laws that took some power away from the nobles and let the peasantry participate in commerce. </span>
Answer:
She had been unwilling to give up her husband to the state for long periods.
Explanation:
Mercy Otis was an important figure in the Revolution of American History, especially because she was an activist, as she used her writing skills and talent to portray women's voice during a tense political time in the United States. However, since according to Akers, women were only allowed to participate in political issues by private influence on their husbands and sons, he used the fact that Mercy Otis was unwilling to give up her husband to state for long to diminish her role and in a way damage her political image and influence.
