Answer:
Save me from myself, I'm going down, down, down!
Explanation:
Answer:
1. He employed layering and overlapping
2. He painted the church in a dim color and used bright orange colors for the closer features in the foreground
3. He also used lighting
Explanation:
The Barfüsserkirche II (Church of the Minorities II) painting by Lyonel Feininger was done in 1926 and it depicted a church that may not be instantly recognized as such by an observer, surrounded by a building in the background. A ray of light seems to illuminate the church making it quite discernable.
The church seems to be deep into the background and this illusion was achieved through the dim color used for the church and the brighter colors used for the buildings encircling the church. Layering and overlapping were also used to create depth when the buildings in the foreground were placed in front while the church was placed in the background.
I believe there is, however I could be incorrect. Are you talking about this person's music, artstyle, or personal appearance? I can answer more accurately the comments if you can provide this information. :)
So these debates are usually over virtue ethics (basically what you value, how you value things etc.). One debate is between the philosophy of utilitarianism and deontology (consequentialism vs means based). Social problems and issues are often times evaluated under particular values. For (a simple) ex. a utilitarian would value implementing a policy to save the most people whereas a deontologist wouldn’t look to save the most people if it meant infringing on the rights of the individual. So a utilitarian would care more about extinction then the most gruesome possible death of one person. Hope this helps!
