It has logic and emotion, but mostly logic. His logic is very clear that if you follow the bible you shouldn't condemned slavery and killings of hundred of people. When practicing the bible and being christians one has to act like christ and follow the teachings of him and the bible. They cannot prove Joseph's enslavement as wrong, but still enslave people who were like Joseph. In it Sewall not only condemns the practice of human trafficking, but goes on to challenge many common slave owners held the practice of enslavement and yet still be followers of God. He uses Joseph as example to bring light to what they are doing wrong. Sewall also cites several Biblical passages which Sewall uses to make a of the practice of man stealing. Using logic is very clear in his writing about people just choosing to ignore themselves on being a hypocrite and make them question their own strong held belief.
I would say that a flare is the least like the others, considering that it doesn't have a bulb, whereas the other options do, and it is fired in the air, whereas the other options are not thrown and ejected.
The source or sources that would support or defend the given assertion about donations to Caring for Kids are; an interview with a student in the club that is asking for donations, to know how it really helped him/her and a comparison of the amount of profits that the club will make without the donation and the amount they'll make with the donation, because they stated that three-quarters of their funds come from private donations.
Theme is usually not stated directly but is instead implied. Theme isn't told directly but is more so indicated.
Different people in the story (hint: CHARACTERization
