Answer
Its Plymouth, I submitted it and got it correct.
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
Answer:
They are both land and colors
Explanation:
Patrick Henry was an attorney and politician who lived in the 1700s. He became a strong voice during the movement for independence in 1770. He commented on the differences between the ideals stated in the declaration of independence and the reality of life in those times. He became a major proponent of the Declaration of Independence which stated that all men are equal. The reality was that there were many inequalities between the colonialists and the British Overlords. The British imposed harsh taxes on the settlers in order to fund the growth and management of their empire. The people of America had finally had enough of this treatment by the British, which is one of the reasons why they started the move towards independence.