Answer:
Mink uses a mix of pathos, ethos, and logos.
Mink’s use of pathos is effective because she appeals to common emotions of belonging and identity. Her use of ethos is effective because she reminds her audience of her credibility as a member of Congress. Her use of logos is effective because she calls upon a variety of facts, evidence, and statistics to support her argument.
Rhetorical Devices
What rhetorical devices does Mink use to strengthen her argument?
How are they effective?
Mink uses a series of rhetorical questions to strengthen her argument.
Mink’s use of rhetorical questions is effective because it invites the audience to consider a solution to the questions she poses. They also allow her to emphasize a point or set up a solution she proposes.
The answer would be D) because if it says nothing beyond that then you would have no clue what will happen.
According to elm more long-lasting changes in audience perspectives occur if listeners process the speech message "centrally."
<h3>What is ELM?</h3>
ELM stands for elaboration likelihood model.
The dual process theory known as the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) of persuasion describes how attitudes change. Richard E. Petty and John Cacioppo created the ELM in 1980. The model seeks to clarify various methods of processing stimuli, their uses, and the effects they have on attitude change. The center route and the periphery route are the two main paths for persuasion suggested by the ELM.
The genuine qualities of the data offered in favor of an argument will probably be carefully and thoughtfully considered by a person under the central pathway, leading to persuasion. The central route requires a high degree of message elaboration in which the person receiving the message generates a significant amount of cognition about the arguments. The effects of changing one's attitude will be reasonably long-lasting, resilient, and behavior-predictive.
On the other hand, under the peripheral approach, persuasion happens when someone associates with favorable or unfavorable cues in the stimulus or makes a straightforward assumption about the merits of the stance that is being promoted. The cues that the person receives via the peripheral channel are typically unrelated to the stimuli' logical quality. These indications will be related to things like the message's production value, the message's sources' attractiveness or legitimacy, or both. The chance of elaboration will depend on a person's drive and capacity to assess the argument being made.
To learn more about elaboration likelihood model (ELM) with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/15827409
#SPJ4
It would be C because most of the time humans dont change the landscape.
Answer:
I dont think this is right but I think that people should studies
