The noun in this sentence which is uncountable, meaning that it names something that cannot be counted is the noun water.
You cannot count how many waters there are - it is uncountable. The other nouns, students and pitcher are countable, so they cannot be the correct answers, but rather water is.
Well! You've got a strong topic, now you just need to get your template down. It's an argumentative essay, so you're going to want an attention-grabbing introduction with your thesis statement. You're going to want body paragraphs that explain both sides of the debate, and then try to convince the reader that your side (the federal gov side) is the best position to take. Wrap it up with a conclusion and voila!
One of your points may be that federal power covers all 50 states, meanwhile state gun laws only govern the individual state. Strict gun laws in Illinois don't matter if it's only a two hour drive to Indiana where they have much looser laws.
Answer:
even though she was on the school track team.
Explanation:
a dependent clause is the part of a sentenc that wouldnt make sence on its own. "the boys didn’t think Dani could win the race" makes sence on its own, so its an independent clause
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
Think about it...what is the plural of foot ? Is is not foots...it is feet...irregular plural noun
