Answer:
The American revolution was inextricably linked with the transformations of the late 18th century, which also took place on the European continent. In time, it almost coincided with the French Revolution, and historically its origin is largely due to the same reasons. Therefore, in the literature these revolutions are often compared. In the question of the origin of the French Revolution, the situational factor is particularly distinguished. The American revolution is interpreted as part of a broad transition period. Both revolutions are interpreted in the context of the theory of clash and change of elites.
First of all, it should be emphasized that the American revolution proceeded under different historical conditions than the French one. While France was a country with a deep historical tradition and centuries-old culture, young America, or rather, the English colonies in America, were relatively recently settled, had not yet had time to acquire traditions and had just begun to create their own culture.
In the American and French revolutions that took place almost at the same time, two essentially opposite concepts prevailed - “checks and balances” and “common will.”.
The American Revolution was a movement based on ideas persistently rethought by the most serious of men in the process of creating a new nation, which was destined to become the freest and most successful community of people in the history of mankind.
The French Revolution was a protest of an angry crowd. It met the desperate resistance of the old classes, and to break it, the merciless dictatorship of the Jacobins was required. The Jacobin dictatorship and the speeches of the plebeian masses were the peak of the revolutionary upsurge in France. The American revolution did not know this kind of phenomenon, and the destruction of the old order did not require such significant efforts.
Explanation:
It is important because if we did not have democratic elections, then we would end up like a communist country where there is one kind of authority and that could corrupt the government (which most do, i.e. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini)
The aftermath of the Civil War was exhilarating, hopeful and violent. Four million newly freed African Americans faced the future of previously-unknown freedom from the old plantation system, with few rights or protections, and surrounded by a war-weary and intensely resistant white population.
Mexican independence was achieved when Mestizo and Creole leaders joined forces in the early 1820s so this statement is <u>True</u>.
<h3>How did the Mexicans achieve independence?</h3>
The Mexicans tried to gain independence twice but because they were divided, the Spanish were able to crush both rebellions.
This changed in the early 1820s when Mestizo and Creole leaders joined forces. This led to the installation of a King/ Emperor in the form of Agustin de Iturbide but his reign lasted for just a year.
Find out more on Agustin de Iturbide at brainly.com/question/13590035.
#SPJ1
<em>Timeline-</em><em> is a display of a list of events, in chronological order.
</em>
<em>Calendar-</em><em> is a series of pages, showing days, weeks, months in a year.</em>
Thanks,
<em>Deku ❤</em>
