All I know is I didn't. James King I
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option O.
All of the above
Explanation: There were a series of wars between the colonial force and the native Americans which were mainly Indians.Even after the independence of the America from British there was a war between Indians and whites. After, independence the federal government took some policy Indians which were not pleasant for them, which led a bloody war between the Indians and white troops.
The duration of the war was long. But the in the long run the Indians were defeated. There were some reasons for the defeat of Indians. The buffalo soldiers were an important part of the war. They were the strength of the Indians warriors. But the decrease of their number became a reason of their defeat.
On the other hand, the white soldiers had advanced military technology like as guns, canons etc. But Indians did not have enough modern weapon to fight against the white soldiers.
Moreover, the number of Indians were less than white Americans. As a result they were outnumbered.
Therefore, all these factors led the defeat of Plains Indians.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "D. President Garfield's assassination by an angry office seeker."
Here are the following choices:
A. President Washington's actions creating the tradition
<span>B. President Jefferson's support of political acceptability. </span>
<span>C. President Jackson's development of the spoils system </span>
D. President Garfield's assassination by an angry office seeker
The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
Answer:5 is a democracy,4 is oligarchy,3 is tyrant
Explanation:
