<span>This is an example of diffusion of responsibility. This
is a common social phenomenon in large groups of people when
responsibility is not explicitly assigned to a member of the group. <span>This
phenomenon has been documented mainly in individualistic cultures, or
in urban areas where people do not take responsibility for the actions
of others.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
I think it's C: The power dynamics between men and women, but I'm not sure. I was actually looking for the answer as well and thought I'd try to help someone out. :)
Answer:
A. both Jonathan's and Joanna's cases
Explanation:
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.
In the question above, the correct answer is A.
Answer:
a person with whom one has a bond of mutual affection, typically one exclusive of sexual or family relations.
<span>Jerry's indifference curves would be straight lines with slope minus one.
An indifference curve is a plot of several curves on an x-y graph where the points in this case represent packages containing a certain amount of Coke and a certain amount of Pepsi. If Jerry wants 10 L of cola and cannot tell the difference between Coke and Pepsi, he will accept any combination of these two sodas as long as the total volume is 10 L. The corresponding points all satisfy the equation x + y = 10, therefore the graph of x + y = 10 may be drawn in an indifference chart.</span>