The correct answer is - E.) to increase national sovereignty.
By cooperation on regional or global level the states do not, and can not really do anything about increasing the national sovereignty. The reason for that is that the national sovereignty is the matter of the state itself, its politics, policies, and handling of the situations in the country. The other countries with whom the state cooperates have nothing to do with it, nor it is their place to interfere in the national sovereignty of the other states, be it friendly states or not.
Answer:
3x + 2
Explanation:
A rectangle's area = L * W
Therefore
(9x+6)/3 = L
L = 3x +2
Answer:
I believe that his audience was more likely to listen to him after he spoke the affirmation shown above.
Explanation:
With the speech shown above, Henry was confirming the importance of patriotism in each and every citizen, even if the view of patriotism was contrary to the view of those who declared themselves patriots. With the speech above, he puts himself in an interesting position that can attract the attention of his audience and make the audience listen to his words. This is because in addition to defending patriotism, posing as a patriot, he criticizes the patriotism standards established at the time.
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
