1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Savatey [412]
2 years ago
15

Pls help ASAP I will mark brainleist.

English
1 answer:
inn [45]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Books are a way for children to reach out lessons
UkoKoshka [18]

what is the question???

6 0
3 years ago
Giant volcanos lurk beneath Antarctic ice
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

what

Explanation:

???

3 0
3 years ago
Which line from the quatrain best summarizes its central
laila [671]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELPP
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

(2) On reaching the kite festival.

Explanation:

First, to answer a question about sentence fragments, you must know the meaning of a sentence fragment. A sentence fragment starts with a capital letter and ends with a quotation mark just like a regular sentence. However, it does not have an independent clause.

An independent clause is a part of a sentence that has at least one subject and action. Independent clauses work on their own. Sometimes you can add a dependent clause to an independent clause. Dependent clauses are usually background information that are added on. Dependent clauses need independent clauses to work; without independent clauses, dependent clauses become a sentence fragment and they don't make sense.

For example, this is an independent clause: "Jack ate an apple." Now, let's add a dependent clause to this sentence: "Jack ate an apple with his eyes closed<em>.</em>" Now, let's have the dependent clause by itself: "With his eyes closed." The dependent clause on its own does not have a subject. Who is "his?" We don't know. What did he do with his eyes closed? We don't know. This is called a sentence fragment. It is a broken part of a sentence.

Now, let's get back to the question. Which sentence is a sentence fragment? Well, now this is pretty easy. You look at each sentence and look to see if it has a subject and an action/thought. If it doesn't have a subject or an action, then it is a sentence fragment. Here are the answers:

1. This makes sense. Steve(subject) went to a kite festival last summer(action).

2. This doesn't make sense. What is "on reaching?" Who reached the kite festival? Who planned on reaching the kite festival? Who decided on reaching the kite festival? This is a sentence fragment.

3. This has a subject(he) and has an action/thought(amazed by the kites). This makes sense.

4. This has a subject(he) and an action/thought(realized that flying a kite needs skill).

Only one of these sentences does not have a subject, which is absolutely required in a sentence: 2. It doesn't even have a complete action. It doesn't say what they did.<em> </em>This is actually a split sentence from 3. If you read answers 2 and 3 and replacing the period in between them with a comma, then the sentence makes sense.

4 0
3 years ago
Why do you believe people are prejudiced agaist those with disabilities the sick the elderly
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer: It is my claim that disability prejudice has been viewed through the lens of prejudices such as anti-Semitism, racism, feminism and homophobia – intolerances that may not be pre-existing, but have been generally recognized and theorized earlier in time.

Explanation:

In many ways, this collection of papers on the burgeoning field of national, regional and international instruments directed towards the redress of disability discrimination is really about the existence of disability prejudice. Most of the papers focus on practical or theoretical issues raised by the laws themselves, or the jurisprudential, social and political choices that shape the drafting and enactment of laws. Nonetheless, every paper is built on the conviction that disability prejudice is a fundamental force behind the exclusion of people with disabilities from a myriad of social and economic opportunities, and one author in particular writes in detail about the personal and systemic consequences of persistent disability prejudice and stereotypes

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 2
    6·1 answer
  • Why doesn't the Party use the word forgery? What language do they use instead?
    7·1 answer
  • Discuss the teacher’s role as a model and participator in early childhood art​
    6·1 answer
  • Write a speach on ( morality and money which is important in life) plz
    13·1 answer
  • Hello! Please Help me! This essay is on roll of thunder, hear my cry! What do you think? Please help me and just comment if two
    9·2 answers
  • Where do the Logan's live in roll of thunder hear my cry? A. On Harlan grangers land B. On their old land C. on government owner
    6·2 answers
  • Which style or structure technique does the author use in "Alexandra's Lesson" to creat a surprising effect for the reader?
    12·1 answer
  • How many people live in esperanzas household A four B six C Eight D ten
    12·1 answer
  • Which type of language would be used when writing a factual news story about an armed robbery?
    9·1 answer
  • Homework write they music love
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!