Answer:
You should recommend the applicant, but qualify your recommendation by pointing out that you think he may have exaggerated some details on his resume
Explanation:
Engineers are ethically obligated to prevent the misrepresentation of their associate's qualifications. You must make your employer aware of the incorrect facts on the resume. On the other hand, if you really believe that the applicant would make a good employee, you should make that recommendation as well. Unless you are making the hiring decision, ethics requires only that you be truthful. If you believe the applicant has merit, you should state so. It is the company's decision to remove or not remove the applicant from consideration because of this transgression.
Answer:
This is A TON of questions but your answers are: (1) C (2) C (3) B (4) A (5) D
(6) A (7) D (8) C (9) D (10) A (11) D (12) A (13) B (14) C (15) D
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
The correct option is D
Explanation:
Option A and C makes the same mistake. The use of "woolen robe that they used" makes it seem as though the woolen robe was a tool used to help them dress their goddess so it is wrong.
While Option B addresses the issue with option A using a "with which" instead of "that", however the use of past perfect tense "had collaborated" eliminates both Option B and Option E.
Option D addresses all the problems mentioned in the other options.
Answer:
jumping juvenile policy
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the type of policy that is being mentioned is known as a jumping juvenile policy. Like mentioned in the question this is a life insurance policy that is bough by a parent but is meant for a child, and the main difference in this policy is that it's value increases by 5 times its original value when the child reaches 21 years of age, even though the premium stays the same.
