All categories

3 years ago

HELP PLEASE I DONT UNDERSTAND THIS AND I HAVE TO WRITE AT LEAST 3 TO 4 SENTENCES IF YOU CAN HELP ME YOU ARE LITERALLY A ANGEL OK

English

1 answer:

yawa3891 [41]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The answer would be theory number one because of how it talks about the fact that only giraffes with longer necks could reach the food and therefore their offspring was also able to survive because of the genetics that were passed down from their parents.

Explanation:

Darwin's theory of natural selection is essentially how quickly and how able the specific organism is able to adapt to its environment by reproducing. Theory one talks about responding to the environment and reproducing while theory number two talks about how eating was the thing that helped them evolve which, though it might be a factor, because without eating, they would have died off long ago, it is not the main reason they they evolved.

You might be interested in

Although Alex is frequently caught stealing money and other valuables from friends as well as strangers, he does not feel guilty

Ivenika [448]

Answer:

weak superego

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

This is langauge arts

Vikki [24]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its a ducks webbed feet

or A

6 0

2 years ago

Read the passage. What should Jake do? What professionalism skills would he be using?

Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

Jake should b.) call the client and work on his report as he speaks to the client. This professional skill would be c.) multitasking.

Explanation:

i'm not 100% sure skjdjksn

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Your class has been chosen to select a new food to be served in the cafeteria. In this project, you will be writing an opinion p

irina1246 [14]

Answer:

sub sandwiches

Explanation:

Because they are good

3 0

2 years ago

read the passage and then answer the question: cecil came home to find the couch cushions gnawed on, a vase lying in pieces on t

dimaraw [331]

The correct answer is Cecil shook his head.

An explicit detail is one in which a writer employs descriptive language to make it crystal apparent to the readers exactly what is happening in a scenario.

As a result, we can observe that the author does not utilise any implicit details that could be misinterpreted and instead uses explicit detail to demonstrate that Cecil shook his head.

Nothing, in fact, suggests that Cecil is unaware of Leo. He genuinely says, "Not again," which indicates that it has already happened. He is thus certain to be familiar with Leo.

Since this is stated explicitly in the text, it is not implied.

To learn more about explicit refer the link:

brainly.com/question/4025751

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago