Explanation:
Your answer depends on your second choice; listening no talking, politeness, mutual understanding, bias, acceptance.
listening is important if you are the recipient of communication.
politeness for the speakers opinion.
mutual understanding for what the speaker is trying to convey.
bias for putting yourself in the speakers shoes.
acceptance for the speakers opinion, wheather or not you share the same opinion..
Can you be more specific plz?
Answer: Yes, If punishments were harsh enough, there would probably be no crime.
Explanation: If people who disobeyed the law were strongly punished, then it would be less likely that people would break the rules of the government. Less people would speed, and more people would probably start being more serious about it. For example, crimes like bank robberies would probably become less likely if they had to pay off all of the money they stole. Being punished for certain things could be harsher. If this happens, the amount of crime will probably decrease, but it will not completely disappear. This is why I think If punishments were harsh enough, there would be no crime.
Answer:
I think its D.
Explanation:
She understands her community’s reaction as part of their faith and works to redeem herself.
Hope it helps!!!
