Answer:
the answer is the first one
Explanation:
Hope that helped
A.) The exciting camp meetings gave people more emotional involvement in religion than they had earlier.
I hope this helps!
Explanation:
Egypt has operated under several constitutions, both as a monarchy and, after 1952, as a republic. The first and most liberal of these was the 1923 constitution, which was promulgated just after Britain declared Egypt’s independence. That document laid the political and cultural groundwork for modern Egypt, declaring it an independent sovereign Islamic state with Arabic as its language. The vote was extended to all adult males. This constitution provided for a bicameral parliament, an independent judiciary, and a strong executive in the form of the king. In 1930 this constitution was replaced by another one, which gave even more powers to the king and his ministers. Following vigorous protest, it was abrogated five years later. The 1923 constitution again came into force but was permanently abolished after the revolution in 1952. The Republic of Egypt was declared in 1953. The new ruling junta—led by a charismatic army officer, Gamal Abdel Nasser—abolished all political parties, which had operated with relative freedom under the monarchy, and a new constitution, in which women were granted the franchise, was introduced in 1956. To replace the abolished political parties, the regime formed the National Union in 1957—from 1962 the Arab Socialist Union (ASU)—which dominated political life in Egypt for the next 15 years. An interim constitution was promulgated in 1964.
Liberty bonds helped the government pay for war.
Answer:
Many people today no longer agree with the founding governing rules of our constitution. Things such as the electoral college and adding supreme justice term limits are highly debated by many today.
Explanation:
To be honest, the constitution shouldn't be controversial and I don't think I have enough context for this question. If a teacher asked you this question on a homework or exam I would be concerned. The founding governance of our countries democracy is not "controversial" or at least it shouldn't be in the public school system. But those are 2 reasons some people dont agree with it.
