1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRINA_888 [86]
3 years ago
6

Most people remember Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as reformers who practiced non-violent forms of protest and advocacy

. Both
effectively changed the popular opinion about emotional issues for their countries and brought in a wave of change that was long overdue.
But the practice of non-violent protest, or civil disobedience, started long before either Gandhi or King. It began with a quiet, shy poet who is
best known for writing a lot about a pond.
Henry David Thoreau lived from 1817 until 1862, mainly in the area of Concord, Massachusetts. The issue that would tear the country apart
in the 1860s had already begun dividing the nation. Thoreau was only 14 when Nat Turner led the slave rebellion in Virginia and was later
hanged. In his late 20s, Thoreau began speaking against slavery in public, echoing the voices of freedmen like Frederick Douglass and Lewis
Hayden
Thoreau believed that a government that supported slavery was corrupt and immoral. He was also deeply suspicious of government. For
these and other reasons, Thoreau refused to pay his poll tax for a number of years. The poll tax was a legal tax owed by every person. It was
basically a tax on one's body. After not paying for years, he was at last arrested. He spent only one night in jail, however, a relative paid the
tax for him. He was reportedly furious that any tax was paid on his behalf.
It was this experience that Thoreau wrote about in an essay called "Civil Disobedience. In this essay, he argued that being moral and just
came before allegiance to government. He wrote "If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of
injustice to another, then, I say, break the law! He also felt that voting was not enough to ensure that the right thing be done. He wrote that
"even voting for the right is doing nothing for it... A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance." He felt that one had a moral
responsibility to resist unjust laws.
Review the third paragraph of Part 1:
Thoreau believed that a government that supported slavery was corrupt ond immoral. He was also deeply suspicious of government. For these and
other reasons, Thoreau refused to pay his poll tax for a number of years. The poll tax was a legal tax owed by every person. It was basically a tax on
one's body. After not paying for years, he was at last arrested. He spent only one night in jail however as a relative paid the tax for him. He was
reportedly furious that any tax was paid on his behalf.
How does the final sentence in the paragraph show the change in the way Thoreau is described? (5 points)
It emphasizes the strength of his beliefs,
It implies he was unpredictable.
It suggests he wasn't such a nice man.
It suggests he really didn't like jail
History
1 answer:
Inessa05 [86]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The first one

Explanation: Thoreau went as far as not paying his poll tax because of his suspicion of the government, which shows how strong his beliefs were.

You might be interested in
Amendment 10 of the Constitution specifically states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor pr
FromTheMoon [43]

Correct answer:

<h2>Limited government</h2>

The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government.  It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution.   Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.

For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written.  They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself.  As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."

Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the US offer aid to Europe in the form of the Marshall Plan, and why did the USSR refuse Marshall Aid for itself and its
ololo11 [35]
The United States offered $13 billion in economic aid to countries like France, Great Britain, Turkey, and Greece in order to ensure economic stability and to stop the spread of communism. After World War II, the US was worried about the Soviet Union and their communis system spreading to other European countries. This is why they gave these countries aid. This is also why the Soviet Union refused it, as they realized the US’s intentions at this time.
4 0
3 years ago
I<br> 2 List the Islamic Trade Routes:
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

(1) Mecca to Constantinople is one such route in spread of Islam.

(2) Mecca to India is second trade route .

(3) Mecca to Alexandria is the third trade route

(4) Mecca to Aden is the fourth trade route.

These 4 trade routes came very handy in spread of Islam.

I think this what what you where looking for... Hope it helps!

7 0
3 years ago
What principle guides the courts' interpretation of the civil liberties found in the Bill of Rights?
notsponge [240]
It would be the principle of "judicial review" that guides the courts' interpretation of the civil liberties found in the Bill of Rights, since this allows the court to determine if a law is violating these rights in any way. 
4 0
3 years ago
Which was an advance of the Neolithic Agricultural Revolution?
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

C)Early people learned to produce their own food.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Complete the paragraph about early trade in Oklahoma.
    9·2 answers
  • Based on this article, which technique(s) does the journalist use to bias the article towards Ms. Rivera and against Mr. Gardeno
    6·1 answer
  • 3 Why did Harrison choose John Tyler as a running mate?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these scientific and technological advances occurred mainly in the twenty-first century? Select two correct answers.
    13·2 answers
  • How did Mussolini become a hero to many Italians?
    9·1 answer
  • How long did the crusaders hold jerusalem?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the only territory of the mainland Americas that is still part of a European country?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the main inference that can be drawn from Jean Jacques Rousseau’s book The Social Contract?
    7·1 answer
  • How do financial intermediaries make investment easier​
    10·1 answer
  • What happened to many native Hawaiians after the Europeans Arrived
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!