This graph shows a proportional relationship. What is the constant of proportionality? Enter your answer as a ratio in simplified form in the box.
2*2*2*2*2 which is equal to 32
Account A is having $1,093 after 3 years. and Account B is having $1,120 after 3 years.
<h3>What is compound interest?</h3>
Compound interest is the interest on a loan or deposit calculated based on the initial principal and the accumulated interest from the previous period.
Elisa put $1,000 in each bank.
Account A: gives her at a rate of 3% per annum compounded annually.
Account B: $40 bonus is added to the account each year.
After 3 years, account A will have

Account A is having $1,093 after 3 years.
After 3 years, account B will have

Account B is having $1,120 after 3 years.
More about the compound interest link is given below.
brainly.com/question/25857212
First part, in quadrilateral WXYZ, WX is parallel to ZY because both sides are equal while the other parallel segments WZ and XY are equal but different side lengths.
The measure of angle Z is 78 because both of the pictures are the same, only rotated. and angle S and Z are acute.
We are given the data on the number of candies handed by neighborhood A and neighborhood B.
Let us first find the mean and variance of each neighborhood.
Mean:


Variance:


A. Null hypothesis:
The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the mean number of candies handed out by neighborhoods A and B.

Research hypothesis:
The research hypothesis is that the mean number of candies handed out by neighborhood A is more than neighborhood B.

Test statistic (t):
The test statistic of a two-sample t-test is given by

Where sp is the pooled standard deviation given by


So, the test statistic is -1.74
Critical t:
Degree of freedom = N1 + N2 - 2 = 6+6-2 = 10
Level of significance = 0.05
The right-tailed critical value for α = 0.05 and df = 10 is found to be 1.81
Critical t = 1.81
We will reject the null hypothesis because the calculated t-value is less than the critical value.
Interpretation:
This means that we do not have enough evidence to conclude that neighborhood A gives out more candies than neighborhood B.