Answer:
Dear diary,
Today I saw a horrible quarrel between my peers.
It was over something as little as a dollar, the two very young boys made a bet, the bet was to see who could spit further away, the reward for spitting the furthest was one dollar. After the game was over and the winner was declared the little boy, he then presented the prize 4 quarters, the other child who had a lack of education was expecting a $1 bill not four quarters, the angry young boy then assaulted the other child who presented the 4 quarters. A ghastly fight then broke out.
Explanation:
To avoid this conflict in the future children should come to an agreement and should be made to get an education.
The twins pretended to be each other because they made a huge mistake
The discussion technique that Jennifer uses most clearly in this conversation is, challenging assumptions.
When we want to give a discussion a different approach, we use this technique through What if... questions, it is necessary to present another alternative to respond to things that we already established.
The other techniques are very different from this one, promoting participation would be mostly used by a moderator not a regular participant in the conversation, MAking an objective is to land the discussion into something real, and Asking for rhetorical questions does expect any kind of answer which we do have in here, therefore the other three options are incorrect.
which lines have one complete thought that best sums up the meaning of the poem
<h2>
Answer: <u><em>
the conscious Act of recognizing understanding and accurately interpreting the messages communicated by others is called listening.</em></u></h2><h2><u><em /></u></h2>
Explanation:
