Answer:
right to privacy
amendment 4 of the bill of right state the right of Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures that is the right of the people to be secure in their persons,places e.t.c and also effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Explanation:
A person is guilty of violation of privacy if he/sheis quilty of civil trespassing on property that is not theirs with the aim record, tap or overhear and observe any person in a privacy area. and also, a person is quilty of violation of privacy if he/she Installs cameras, e.t.c or uses any device for recording, photographing e.t.c in a private place without the consent of the property owner
It is highly wrong illegal to install cameras in another person's compound or house without their consent especially taking video surveillance of someone in their comfort zone therefore the surveillance will violate some privacy laws.
The conducted experiment of Horselenberg et al. (2003) is a replication of the Kassin and Kiechel (1996) findings. They used the classic computer crash paradigm wherein they falsely accused the participants of touching the forbidden keys and used a pseudo-eyewitness who insisted they saw the participants touched the forbidden keys. With all the variables they explored: individual difference in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures; their findings suggest that only fantasy proneness has a relationship with false confessions. The result of this experiment shows that false confessions really occur; and that it is easy to make the participants confess because of the pseudo-eyewitness as evidence that made them internalize they really had touched the forbidden keys that resulted to the computer crash.
Answer:
I believe the correct answer here would be A. D comes close, but Starbuck's 'rule' is more of a request rather than an outright ban, as the open letter on their website states: "First, this is a request and not an outright ban. Why? Because we want to give responsible gun owners the chance to respect our request—and also because enforcing a ban would potentially require our partners to confront armed customers, and that is not a role I am comfortable asking Starbucks partners to take on."
Answer:
a) The potential problem with relying on the results of the poll is bias due to the following criteria
1) The age group of the participants a will be more within a narrow range based on mainly newly employed and age bracket and others below a certain age level that spend time shopping
2) Depending on the kind of items sold at the shopping mall, a candidate may have more or less popularity at a given mall
3) The location of the mall can be a stronghold for a particular candidate
b) To increase the accuracy of the poll, the media company can take the following actions;
1) Conduct a poll at a similar shopping mall at a different location
2) Conduct polls with people not in the shopping mall
3) Ask people in a number of randomly selected homes ensuring the members eligible to vote in each home are reached, and repeat the process across the different populated regions where voting takes place in the state
c) The poll result indicates that the middle age employed group are approximately equally likely to vote for either candidate in the state and that the election will be more largely decided by the other groups of eligible voters
Explanation:
