Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
C . dA. getting his hands on a President Cleveland card.
B. helping Armand and his family.
<span>C. befriending Rollie Tremaine.</span>
Answer:
Uh, what do you call Cardi B when she runs?
Cardi O.
Get it?
Explanation:
Cause running is cardio and Cardi b is running so-
Alliteration refers to the stylistic device wherein a number of words, which have the same 1st consonant sound, occur closely within a series.
Some obvious examples of alliteration are:
-Alice’s aunt ate apples and acorns around August.
<span>-But a better butter makes a batter better
</span>
Among your choices, the closest representation of alliteration is The Snack You Can Sneak. Although the choice "Simply the Best Snacks" does have 2 S's. The former has a better creative and rhythmic value.
So I would go for "<span>The Snack You Can Sneak" as the best answer here. </span>
<span>Romantic poetry is sometimes criticized because it is subjective. Many people believe that sense this would be a topic about "love", that this would only be one factor that would only be in a "romantic poem". Thus, this would be the reason to why it would be known to be "subjective".</span>
