Answer:
Government is predicated upon the initiation of force. For example, if you were to stop paying your taxes, you would get a letter from the IRS saying you owe such and such amount. They would keep sending you these letters for a while, but eventually they would send a group of men with badges and guns to throw you in a cage for not giving this institution YOUR money.
Courts are often crowded because of overcriminalization (prosecuting individuals for victimless crimes) and there is no price associated with criminal cases. Cases often get plea bargained because prosecutors have an incentive to have high conviction rates, not to serve their clients since they are paid by the state. This often means that crimes that are easier to prosecute get more attention.
Also you have the current problem where people sue each other willy nilly. This problem could be solved by simply requiring the person who brings suit to pay for the defendant's legal expenses if the defendant is proven innocent of any wrongdoing.
Also the victim of a crime in our current system gets screwed twice. Once by the offender who perpetrated the crime, then again by the state, which confiscates his wealth in order to pay for the prosecution and housing of the criminal. Historically private law was centered around compensating the victim financially.
In absence of a state professional judges would emerge that would make decisions based on a commonly established practices which could be codified into a law book. This would be analogous to how dictionaries codify definitions for words, you don’t need a central body to come up with new words and definitions, language emerges spontaneously. So too, law would be established in this way and in fact this is what English common law is based on, communal law that was established and accepted by the community. Similarly customs would emerge for the amount of times you can appeal, based on the crime committed.
Private law would solve many of the above problems listed. It would eliminate overcriminalization (it would be unlikely that someone would bring suit against someone for using drugs), it would focus on restitution and lawyers would be working for the victims instead of simply working for a high conviction rate.
Federal Open Market Committee is the <span>group on the Federal Reserve organization chart decides whether to raise or lower interest rates.</span>
Answer:
1. Nararapat lamang na itapon natin ang basura sa tama nitong kalalagyan upang di maduming tingnan ang ating kapaligiran at upang malayo tayo sa mga sakit kapag itoy nagkalat dahil sa ulan.
2. Sa aking palagay nararapat na ding itigil ang pagputol ng mga puno upang di makalbo ang kagubatan na siyang tahanan ng mga hayop at upang walang gaanong pinsala o baha pag dumating ang bagyo.
3. Karapat-dapat na ding itigil ang planta dahil ang usok nito ay nakadagdag ng polusyon sa hangin at higit pa nakakasira sa ating ozone layer.
4. Nararapat na ding hinay-hinayin ang pagdami ng tao dahil isa din itong suliranin sa ating pangkapaligiran ang pagdami ng populasyon ng tao.
5. Bilang tao nararapat tayong maging responsable sa hakbang na ating gagawin pag-isipan nating maigi kung ito ba'y nakakatulong o nakakasama sa kapaligiran na siyang dahilan ng pagkaubos ng ating likas na yaman.
ctto.
Answer:
She can develop major depressive disorder.
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, Tara is sad and hopeless about her life. She maintains a very negative image about how she will live from now on and this can lead to very serious psychological problems, such as major depression disorder.
This disorder is mainly characterized by the constant feeling of anguish, sadness and lack of motivation that individuals feel in relation to themselves and the life they have. This disorder can lead to loss of interest to all possible factors, in addition to causing physical and behavioral changes.
I think it means “whenever a government becomes unjust or corrupt the people have to right to tweak it,like makes laws and stuff, or end it altogether”.
