Bud uses his rules for both, but it's really based on your opinion. I personally think some rules are meant for physically surviving, and some rules are meant for thriving. For example, the rule "Gone = dead!" (rules #28) really helps him for both. But the rule "Don't ever say something bad about someone you don't know - especially around a bunch of strangers." (rule #63) helps him survive. He could get physically hurt by someone, and he's more likely to if it's about someone he doesn't know and doesn't know what that person is capable of. When I did this with "Bud, not Buddy", I said it helps him thrive more, but it's really based on your opinion! Hope this helped. <3
1.
Answer:
In this voluminous work, the author describes the period of Hitler's life until 1936, which was much less familiar to readers than the period of his reign. Hitler's youth, participation in the First World War, entry into politics and coming to power are presented from a psychological as well as a sociological standpoint showing the ideas behind Nazi ear and its historical events.
Explanation:
Adolf Hitler's most complete biography, published in 1998 in the UK in the light of recent historical knowledge. HITLER (YOUTH) 1889- 1936 HEBRIS reflects the best on HIltler's reflections and ideology that affected Nazi era.
2. The picturing of Hitler' settings in the first part of the book that made his rise possible: the virulent anti-Semitism in Vienna of 1930's an the the toxic nationalism that affected Bavaria in the 20s leading to Aryan histeria.
Explanation:
Kershaw, Hitler: 1889-1936 Hubris, page 433, My emphasis provides a analysis of the wider social and political forces in Germany that affected Hitler's growth and acting.
The bandwagon fallacy is in the insistence that good cities are good because they have rail.
Explanation:
The bandwagon fallacy is where the causation of something is confused as an effect.<u> It is the argument that because all the great cities of the country have light rail, our city too should have the same light rail system to be as good as them.</u>
This argument falls apart because the rail will not curb the problems that the passage itself talks about and then willfully ignores. I<u>n fact, bringing the rail to town will actually aggravate some of the issues mentioned here</u>. Which is why the argument becomes more weak.
Option A answers the text best.