Answer:
<em>By increasing volume of trade and also increasing the geographical range of preexisting and newly active trade networks.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
Improvement in transportation technologies in post classical era led to an increase in the amount of goods and people that could be ferried along trade route. It also facilitated the discovery and usage of new trade routes which would otherwise not be passable due to previous transportation technologies. Improvement in commercial practices like adoption of new languages and an agreement of payment modes also made trading with other people possible.
some of these post classical era trade routes that shaped transportation technology and commercial practices improvement includes the silk trade route in the Asia, the trans Saharan trade route in Africa and the Indian ocean trade route among others.
Some of the possible solutions which a person can make use of in the case that his rights are violated are:
- Redress in court
- Informal negotiations
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the inalienable rights which an individual enjoys and cannot be tampered with except in special cases where the peace needs to be kept.
Some of the human rights includes:
- Right to life
- Right to ownership of property
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom to peaceful assembly
With this in mind, we can see that seeking redress in court is the most popular way so that the court can determine that your right was actually violated and make a legal ruling or to make use of informal negotiations in civil situations such as demanding an apology and in some cases, compensation.
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/10080939
Answer:
1917
Explanation:
The Tsarist autocracy collapsed in 1917 due to the following reasons— (a) Miserable Condition of the Workers (i) The industrial workers in Russia got very low wages. (ii) They had very long working hours, sometimes upto 15 hours.
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
