Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
Answer:
The Molly Maguires were an Irish 19th-century secret society active in Ireland, Liverpool and parts of the Eastern United States, best known for their activism among Irish-American and Irish immigrant coal miners in Pennsylvania. After a series of often violent conflicts, twenty suspected members of the Molly Maguires were convicted of murder and other crimes and were executed by hanging in 1877 and 1878. This history remains part of local Pennsylvania lore and the actual facts much debated among historians.[1]
Answer:
Hey There! my name is Jay and I'm here to help! ヅ
<h2>Question</h2>
Which of the following BEST describes what happens if the Supreme Court refuses to review a case?
<h2>Answer</h2>
Explanation:
For more Information Heres a Link! :) :brainly.com/question/14914692
Therefore, I hope this helps!
Take care!
❁◕ ‿ ◕❁
I might can help you, I'm learning about the intolerable acts and Boston massacre and all that
Answer:
money, more than any scientific zeal for discovery was the reason for exploration as<u> whoever reached a new place first could simply loot its resources for profit</u>.
Explanation:
the age of European exploration saw explorers charting maps and reaching the very zenith of the world. <u>these expeditions were well funded by various European kingdoms that understood that the resources that can be discovered</u> in distant lands can reap profits for their kingdom.
hence, they urged explorers to discover more places which were either taken over or colonized and then used for their resources..
