1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nekit [7.7K]
3 years ago
7

Does anybody have any good studying tips lol???

English
2 answers:
ozzi3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Lol no one.... M.......

madam [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

in need of some

Explanation:

like??

You might be interested in
“I felt that I lay upon my back, unbound.”
MariettaO [177]
Please give the full question.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Had miss emily really shut up the top floor of her house? why does the narrator say "evidently"?
nadya68 [22]
<span>Thinking back, the narrator recalls, “Now and then we would see her in one of the downstairs windows.” Likely, it only occurred to the narrator after learning about Homer Barron that Miss Emily was always in a downstairs window. In fact, earlier in the story, the narrator only says that “a window that had been dark was lighted and Miss Emily sat in it” when the men of the won sprinkled lime around her house to kill the offensive smell that emanated from it. He does not specify where in her house the window was. Moreover, he declares that Miss Emily “had evidently shut up the top floor.” Obviously, it was only “evident” that Miss Emily had closed off the upstairs of her home after her death when the townspeople forced their way into the house, up the stairs, and into the tomb-like room where the body of Homer Barron lay. This passage also plays with the notion of seeing and being seen, the ambiguity of watching and being watched. The narrator states, “Now and then we would see her.” He goes on to explain that whether Miss Emily was “look...</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which character trait can be used to describe the antagonist in the play Antigone?
weeeeeb [17]

The answer is ruthless

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the passage from an op-ed piece. What evidence would best challenge the author's claim?
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

C.  One recent study has found that cluttered, disorderly environments actually help spark creativity and fresh insights.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does the author use only Victor’s information in this passage? Victor is the one who wrote the novel. Readers enjoy multiple
gogolik [260]

This question is missing the passage. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:

18.

Frankenstein Chapter 2, Excerpt 2

By Mary Shelley

Victor Frankenstein continues recounting the influences that lead to his great experiment:

An accident again changed the current of my ideas. When I was about fifteen years old we had retired to our house near Belrive, when we witnessed a most violent and terrible thunderstorm. It advanced from behind the mountains of Jura, and the thunder burst at once with frightful loudness from various quarters of the heavens. I remained, while the storm lasted, watching its progress with curiosity and delight. As I stood at the door, on a sudden I beheld a stream of fire issue from an old and beautiful oak which stood about twenty yards from our house; and so soon as the dazzling light vanished, the oak had disappeared, and nothing remained but a blasted stump. When we visited it the next morning, we found the tree shattered in a singular manner. It was not splintered by the shock, but entirely reduced to thin ribbons of wood. I never beheld anything so utterly destroyed.

Why does the author use only Victor's information in this passage? (5 points)

A. Victor is the one who wrote the novel.

B. Readers enjoy multiple perspectives.

C. It allows Victor to tell the story.

D. It prevents readers from knowing the ending.

Answer:

The reason why the author uses Victor's information in this passage is:

C. It allows Victor to tell the story.

Explanation:

We can safely choose letter C through elimination. Letter A affirms that Victor wrote the novel. We need to be careful here. Victor is one of the narrators, but he is not the author, he is not the person who wrote the novel. That is Mary Shelley.

Letter B claims that readers enjoy multiple perspectives. There is no way for us to know that. It may or may not be true, but there is nothing to reveal Shelley thought of that when deciding on multiple narrators.

Letter D claims it prevents readers from knowing the ending. That is not necessarily true. If Shelley wishes to have the narrator tell readers the ending right from the start, she can do that. There is no rule to prevent such a thing from happening.

Therefore, we can conclude that using only Victor's information means the author wanted to tell this part of the story from his perspective, wanted to allow him to tell the story. Letter C is the best option.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does Franklin's Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America differ from Rowlandson's The Narrative of the Captivity and
    7·2 answers
  • Fill in the blanks with suitab<br>1.Garden<br>2.t__red<br>3.W_n_o_<br>4.G_0_nd<br>5.F_ig_ten_d​
    14·2 answers
  • How does the information in this section build on what you have learned so far?
    11·2 answers
  • The following question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.
    7·1 answer
  • Can you guys read and answer 1 question, will mark brainliest
    6·1 answer
  • How can someone prove they are mature?​
    14·1 answer
  • Katie's plan to get into college was a house of cards on a crooked table is<br> an example of.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the effect of endikus dream interpretation
    13·1 answer
  • Identify if this is Claim of value, Claim of policy, or Claim of Fact:
    7·1 answer
  • Why don't we visit our teacher?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!