Answer:
People admire celebrities and famous people because of how much they are loved, and people treat them special. Back then, Roman gods never showed themselves -- in all due respect -- they kind of only existed in their culture. Celebrities are real, ordinary human-beings, but people forget that. You can see them live, and if you're lucky, in person; gods were never actually seen, but only existed through stories passed down. However, both are worshiped in some way. Today, people can easily become obsessed with famous idols, which can be dangerous. Back then, people depended on these gods for wisdom and things like that, which could be dangerous if they were doing morally wrong things to please their gods.
Make sure your friend is okay when you sense something is wrong.
Know when to be serious, and know when to be goofy.
Go the extra mile when they ask for help.
Don't give up on them during their darkest hours.
Make them feel wanted.
Just be yourself around the person you want to care about, and try your hardest.
There's no really BIG critical requirements for a good friendship, you just know what's right from wrong.
Hope I helped.
Answer:
Cores taken near the oceanic ridges show the age and thickness of the sediment increases as you move away from the ridge. This supports seafloor spreading because it indicates the
- the younger crust nearest the ridges has not been around long enough to accumulate the same thickness of sediment as sections farther out did.
Explanation:
- Seafloor spreading is such a process which takes place when a volcano occurs. Due to which a new oceanic crust is formed which gradually move away from the ridge.
- Cores taken near the oceanic ridges show the age and thickness of the sediment increases as you move away from the ridge. The younger crust nearest the ridges has not been around long enough to accumulate the same thickness of sediment that's why the the sections of crust that are further from the ridges have longer time to have more thickness and age.
I believe the answer is: <span>correlation does not indicate cause-and-effect relationships
Another example of this false perception is the study about the relation between soy and breast cancer.
A popular study conducted in united states concluded that there is a higher correlation between citizens with high soy consumption with breast cancer, and people falsely attribute it to a cause and effect relationship.
This conclusion is disproved after being pointed out that people in East Asia consume much more soy products but have lower rate of cancer.</span>