Answer:fxgugihoydtsdyfoihtsrtdiugophigufhgxilghxf
Explanation:
Answer:
Evidence supports the claim:
- The clock kept saying the time over and over and the house kept preparing food, but no one ate it.
- No one got up to go to work or school.
- The house was the only one standing in the neighborhood, which was among dust and ashes.
Explanation:
The name of the story refers to the poem by Sara Teasdale where the idea that nature will survive humanity is transmitted.
It can be interpreted that what happened to the family of the house was that they were exposed to a nuclear explosion, since their figures marked with fire are seen on the side of the house, the same thing happened in Japan after the atomic bomb of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even the poem was published 5 years after this event.
The poem shows an automated house that continues to operate even though there are no longer any people. Keep cleaning, keep cooking and reporting the time, but no one exists anymore.
In fact, this house was the only one left standing in the desolate neighborhood. Even when the house collapses and is almost destroyed, it still has some basic functions.
Moms are there when you need them and there when you don’t
They help other people and you even if you won’t
They love at all times and each day
They help you put a smile on your face and make you feel gay
At all times they are your mom
I guess you could say they are the bomb
The claim in the passage, "Beyond Thirst: The Global Water Crisis" is this: "Left unchecked, the crisis will only worsen."
<h3>What is a Claim?</h3>
A claim is an opinion that is usually made at the introductory part of a text. In the second paragraph of the cited passage, the author claimed that there is an existing challenge with water, which left unchecked, will only worsen.
In the body of the passage, he supported this claim with proof.
Learn more about claims here:
brainly.com/question/2748145
The answer is B: Less than a decade ago, the HSUS...an affiliate [Human Society International].
Brackets are used to give the writers (when they need to add information) an opportunity to add an explanation, or emphasis to a word, or change a <em>quote to fit to a sentence, but without changing the meaning of the text</em>. In A) <em>global work</em> doesn't need explanation; C) <em>decade</em> doesn't need explanation; D) <em>HSUS</em> was already explained in the first sentence of the text.
